Ross Ulbrichtâs Lawyers Found a Another Corrupt DEA Agent in Silk Road Case
The Silk Road case exemplified images associated with corrupt law enforcement officers. Carl M. Force, a former DEA agent, extorted 80 bitcoins from the owner of the Silk Road marketplace. Shaun W. Bridges, ex-Secret Service, stole money using admin accounts. A Federal judge gave them both prison time. But now, Ross Ulbricht’s defense team found signs of a third corrupt officer. This agent, the team said, gave lawyers sufficient reason to believe evidence tampering was now obvious.
In a press conference on November 29, lawyers announced the discovery of new chat logs. They were between Dread Pirate Roberts (DPR) and a mysterious figure known as âalbertpacino.” Additional logs surfaced, too. The defense also found conversations between DPR and âalpacino,â or ânotwonderful.â Albertpacino offered DPR information about law enforcement’s investigation in exchange for weekly payments. Notably, Carl Force offered the same service. According to the defense team, these logs were new. Earlier versions of the forum’s chat logs lacked the “alpacino” chats. The defense team said said that law enforcement tampered with evidenceâto cover up the chat logs, at the minimum.
Lindsay Lewis, one of Ulbrichtâs attorneys said:
We find this to be a significant discovery, considering that weâve always believed that there was other corruption that we didnât know about and the government didnât know about either. It further calls into question the integrity of the entire Silk Road investigation.
Albertpacino’s existence failed to stand out initially. DPR, in his journals, wrote about “albertpacino,” a DEA agent that traded evidence for bitcoin. Carl Force, the now-convicted DEA agent, offered the same service. Many believed “albertpacino” was simply another pseudonym used by Force. Additionally, a diary Ulbricht kept on his laptop made several mentions of “albertpacino.” The prosecution used the diary as evidence in Ulbricht’s trial. And the team’s discovery of “albertpacino” was no revelation. âThere are really tons of useful nuggets that I do have to offer,â alpacino wrote. He added âand what my birdie doesnât know, he can probably find out.â
Wired sums up the defense’s view on alpacino:
Ulbrichtâs defense team argues that alpacino is, in fact, a different law enforcement official. Or at least someone with connections to law enforcement. They point to the fact that the initial court filing that accused Carl Mark Force of corruption listed alpacino as one of his pseudonyms. But that alias was dropped from Forceâs criminal complaint, indictment and all subsequent court documents.
The team additionally noted that alpacino demanded only $500, weekly, from DPR. Force required much more money and, instead of weekly, he wanted it all up front. Ulbrichtâs defense filed a demand with the government to get all details pertaining to alpacino.
Joshua Dratel, the lead defense attorney, said these findings may lead to a discovery. And, furthermore, could lead to a new trial motion. Lindsey Lewis from Dratel’s office explained the importance of the findings:
The deletion of the Silk Road forum database […] is significant because it confirms further tampering with the Silk Road investigation. And the evidence is […] distinct from SA Force and SA Bridges’ corruption. This revelation definitively establishes that the digital evidence in Ross’s case lacks integrity.
In addition, since even the backup copy [of the server] is incomplete we still do not know what else DPR learned about the Silk Road. The defense at trial was that DPR conceived and executed an exit strategy to frame Ross Ulbricht and those six weeks are therefore critical.
The six weeks Lewis referred to were the weeks of missing data. There was no way to know what information DPR learned about the case in those six week, Lewis said.
Lewis said the evidence discovered was only evidence of tampered evidence. The defense team will not stop here. More evidence is out there, she said. âThis is just what we have. It begs the question of what donât we have,â she says. âWe donât yet know what we donât know.â
Conversations between DPR and this DEA agent can be found on Gwernâs website.